THE HEADLINE ON this article at business insider is:
Wynn CEO Goes On Epic Anti-Obama Rant On Company Conference Call
Which I think is wrong. Deep down in the rant alluded to, Wynn states that he supports a certain senior senator from Nevada. Which, to me, implies that the headline should have been:
Steve Wynn Supports Harry Ried: Boycott Wynn Properties
…Even though it’s acknowledged that boycotts rarely have much economic impact. The political statement is that important. I’m SICK and TIRED of treasonous businessmen who support foresworn oathbreaking politicians, rent-seeking or practicing to buy protection from the wrecking and looting behavior of said politicians, at the expense of the wider nation. F*** ’em.
Cross-posted at Eternity Road.