COME(S) FROM TENTH AMENDMENT Center‘s Michael Boldin, via World Net Daily.
“These nine unelected lawyers are not the determination of what the Constitution is. We the people are.”
As I been sayin’, if force — even lethal force — is permissible — even mandatory — in the prevention of a felony in progress, what level of force is to be permitted or required in the prevention of a violation of the law of the land from which the authority for the felony law descends — the Constitution?
The … states considering nullification of Obamacare are calling for penalties, including fines and jail time, for any agent seeking to enforce the federal provisions.
It’s really pretty simple … It’s nothing more than states saying ‘no’ to unconstitutional acts.
When the federal government violates the Constitution, what do we do about it?
…
…[T]he idea that states would reject a Washington demand is not radical, it’s reasonable. …[W]hat’s radical is the idea that the federal government can be the final arbiter of the extent of its own powers.
Read the whole thing. I am pleased to note that, among the states pushing for nullification is Idaho, where my baby sister is a sitting state senator. Good on ya, kid!
Baby Troll
