AND YOU’RE ALL CELEBRATING and shit because you think you won somethimg.
Hardly. Both the plaintiff and the judge in the case side-stepped the real issue — the one that had everybody all, “He can’t do that/He just did.”
Does the state have the lawful, legitimate, just and proper authority to make such a law in the first place?
And the only right, proper, just, and lawful answer is, “Hell no!” But that’s not the answer that won the day, now, is it?
So… Who exactly won that one? The forces of liberty? Or the forces of creeping statism?