Sometimes...
...Ya jus' gotta go to war in the unnerwear ya got on.
--Dolly
Thursday, April 12, 2012
Looks Like Friday the Thirteen...
COMED OF A FRIDAY this month.
Mark Philip Alger
| Comments (0)
| 
...
Thursday, April 12, 2012
Didn’t Have the “Luxury” of...
[MOOCHELLE] NOT WORKING, sez the Prez.
Yeah. Right.
'Cause it's really hard work being a rent-seeking parasite.
Doncha know...
Mark Philip Alger
| Comments (1)
|
...
Thursday, April 12, 2012
Hillary Rosen Says, “What?”...
SO RICH PEOPLE take no thought for the economic future of their children. They're not worried with rapacious leftists slavering after their hard-earned wealth? Hmm. Interesting.
So put Rosen on the shelf next to Debbie Blabbermouth Schultz as being textbook cases of liberal stupidity. It's a long shelf and growing.
A-a-a-and... the party of Occupy Your Shorts hires as a spokesmodel the ultimate tool of greedy corporations. No. No situation ethics there.
Mark Philip Alger
| Comments (0)
|
...
Thursday, April 12, 2012
I Guess This Is Just a Matter of Opinion...
AND A THOUSAND years of experience in book design and readability goes out the window once engineers get their hands on it. A thirty year career as a world-class designer similarly goes out the window because only twenty of that has been aided by computers. Oh. Excuse me. All thirty has been computer-aided, but only twenty has been "aided" by art-illiterate engineers.
Don't think so? Try getting usable PostScript output from Microsoft Word. Or MS Publisher. Fah!
So, when people try to tell you that there should be a line space between paragraphs of text in online media, despite all contrary advice from other people who -- oh, I don't know... KNOW WHAT THEY'RE DOING -- you, of course, should listen to them.
I think Joel Friedlander is too kind to the idiots in his comments.
You don't think you're being a tad ... er ... dogmatic?
Not when it comes to vehemently rejecting page design advice from people who think that hypertext is a sensible protocol for conveying linear information, or that layout rules for scientific matter and for fiction should be the same. No. I don't.
Mark Philip Alger
| Comments (0)
|
...
Thursday, April 12, 2012
I Hope the Story is Wrong...
THAT MITTENS WILL pick Ohio's own Rob Portman as his Veep. Yes, it would be a brilliant maneuver. Yes, it could presage a Portman run for Prez in 8 years -- a Good Thing for the Country, to be sure. The fly in the honey would be that Ohio would have to replace Portman in the Senate. Now, we do get to replace Sherrod Brown, the commie-symp moron from the north, this year. But we don't need to have to replace Portman, too.
Mark Philip Alger
| Comments (1)
|
...
Thursday, April 12, 2012
An Interesting Read on Pricing EBooks...
FROM J.A. MARLOW with regard to Amazon's 47 North imprint, with a spicing of some RWA research. Food for thought -- and confirming ideas I've had for awhile, now. If you price your work too low, less will be thought of it. This in on all fours with my experience pricing commercial artwork. Sensitivity to price cuts both ways.
RTWT, as well as following the outlinks.
Mark Philip Alger
| Comments (1)
|
...
The Cloud Observatory
Wednesday, April 11, 2012
Observation 55 (New Series...
...
Wednesday, April 11, 2012
Happy Birthday...
HAPPY BIRTHDAY to Toni.
Mark Philip Alger
| Comments (3)
|
...
Wednesday, April 11, 2012
I See No Reason...
NOT TO GO WITH THE STRAIGHT talking points on this one.
The Buffet Ruse is a lie.
Given that the top whatever percent of taxpayers pay whatever percent of all income taxes, anyone who backs the concept of the Buffet Ruse with a straight face ought to be given no further credence on any subject.
You should not listen to them on matters political. You should not even accept their recommendation for summer beach reading. They are witless tools, with no connection whatsoever to reality.
Their employers, creditors -- hell, their churches -- should look at them askance and not ever trust their word on any subject from now til Kingdom Come.
Nor should anyone accept any statement at face value from anyone who believes them on the Buffet Ruse.
And, you, gentle reader, should stand at the sharp point of all this distrust. After all, the lies are aimed at you -- at shamelessly trying to arouse bigotry, envy, covetousness in your heart. And, after all is said and done, why should you trust them? If they are willing to lie on this subject, how can you ever believee anything they ever say ever again?
Hmmm?
Remember, my friends: friends don't let friends vote Democrat.
Mark Philip Alger
| Comments (0)
|
...
Wednesday, April 11, 2012
Spotted at Maggie’s...
AND PROBABLY a part of a post on a different subject altogether, but this list seems to me a pretty fair precis of the left's positions on life, the universe, and everything.
- Food isn't about Nutrition
- Clothes aren't about Comfort
- Bedrooms aren't about Sleep
- Marriage isn't about Romance
- Talk isn't about Info
- Laughter isn't about Jokes
- Charity isn't about Helping
- Church isn't about God
- Art isn't about Insight
- Medicine isn't about Health
- Consulting isn't about Advice
- School isn't about Learning
- Research isn't about Progress
- Politics isn't about Policy
I could add a few more:
- Taxation isn't about revenue
- Regulation isn't about safety
- Sex isn't about reproduction
- Adulthood isn't about responsibility
- America isn't about freedom
- Freedom isn't about what's good for people
- Law isn't about morality
- Morality isn't about behavior
- Responsibility isn't about consequences
Add yours in comments.
Mark Philip Alger
| Comments (4)
|
...
...
The Cloud Observatory
Thursday, April 05, 2012
Observation 54 (New Series)...
...
Thursday, April 05, 2012
Quote of the Day...
Lie after lie after lie after lie.
--Sen Edward M. Kennedy D-MA (dec)
Trying to fisk Obama on the Supreme Court, on Constitutional law, on the economy, on commerce, on the budget, on regulation's costs and effects -- on anything -- is a fool's game. Simpler to say that the man is incapable of telling the truth.
And, if you recall that this same thing has been said of Democrat politicians of all levels and stripes, perhaps there's a lesson to be taken from that. (See below.)
Mark Philip Alger
| Comments (0)
|
...
Thursday, April 05, 2012
Obama on the Supreme Court...
AS RUSH IS PUTTING IT he's trying to get the meme planted that "The Supreme Court is going to take away your health care." And, if you know that's not so, that the President lies through his teeth, and you're certain that no reasonable American could possibly swallow such a load of codswallop, remember this: Selected, Not Elected. The American Left has dined out for 12 years now on the lie that Al Gore really won the 2000 election and the Supreme Court forced George Bush on America. Never mind that, using the count Gore was suing to get, Bush won. Never mind that, counting every ballot possible, Bush won. The closest Gore got to winning would have been using the count that Bush wanted. But, objectively, Gore lost. Which is why the Right saw the whole, sordid affair as an attempt at electoral theft and called it Sore Loserman.
And, no, nobody on the Left is specifically smart or prescient enough to know that, twelve years later, yet another illegitimate power grab would be threatened by a Supreme Court operating within its constitutional limits and requiring the same of Congress and the President. But they did know that an honest Supreme Court, an uncorrupted Supreme Court would be a significant roadblock to their illegitimate aspirations. That what they (the Left) want to do is, to put it flatly, against the law. And, in order to get around the protections the Constitution emplaces around liberty and the rule of law, they'd have to dirty up the Supreme Court.
They've known it for decades.
And so, they've set about meticulously corrupting the Supreme Court, by running right up to the line of treason and dancing away before serious charges could be leveled, by nominating jurists and forcing their confirmation by barely acceptable and barely constitutional methods that nevertheless were born of bad faith intent, jurists who, well in advance of their nomination were clearly not suited for any seat on any bench, let alone on the Supreme Court, jurists nominated if for no other reason than to dilute the minimum standards of acceptability for Supreme Court Justices, by seeking at every turn to delegitimize in the eyes of the People both the actual text of the Constitution and the role of the Supreme Court in its defense.
That alone should be enough to cause you to withdraw your support from Democrats and to look askance at everything they stand for and propose. After all, if they'll lie, cheat, steal to get what you and they claim to want, how do you know you can trust them when it comes to your cherished dreams and aspirations?
To put it flatly, you can't. In fact, I will guarantee you that, if they ever achieve their ultimate aims -- totalitarian power -- you, their supporters, will be the first put up against a wall, your family charged for the bullet used to kill you. That is, if they're not liquidated along with you.
Bank on it.
Mark Philip Alger
| Comments (0)
|
...
...
The Cloud Observatory
Wednesday, April 04, 2012
Observation 53 (New Series)...
...
Wednesday, April 04, 2012
Bizarro President...
THE O IS OUT THERE -- waa-a-a-ay out there -- with statements, seemingly everything out of his mouth, that refuse to comport with reality. In fact, reality is running down the street, screaming in terror, trying to escap the distortion field.
He keeps talking lying about people who don't have insurance, who would be able to get it under his plan (read: be required willy nilly to purchase it), but couldn't otherwise.
My first reaction to that claim, almost as an aside, is that the key reason they couldn't is that they couldn't afford a policy with all the government-mandated coverages they neither want nor need. But that's just an aside.
He conveniently ignores those who have already lost their coverage because, in anticipation of the massive and unpredictable market distortions any such plan (not just Obamacare -- ANY socialized medicine scheme) would bring into place, insurance carriers increased their rates for several years running.
In fact, when you hear about the increasing costs of health care, you need to realize that those increases are largely -- if not totally -- related to increased insurance cost, whether for individual or group coverage or for medical liability and malpractice insurance. Trust me, I know. I pay cash for services. And, with the exception of a few medications where the power of the government actively prevents price reductions (ask a pharmacist why you can't get generic insulin, for example, even though none of the current brands is under patent), my costs are FAR lower than what insurance companies pay. Those same insurance companies that claim their confiscatory rates are justified because they can negotiate lower prices on your behalf.
But the facts remain that 1) my employer found he could no longer afford coverage and had to stop paying for insurance (although he did give me a raise equivalent to most of what he formerly paid for my coverage). 2) I cannot get even catastrophic coverage because, due to the requirements Obamacare put on, no commercial carrier will touch anyone in my age cohort with insulin dependent diabetes (and the state pools are A)government insurance, with all the issues inherent thereto, and B) means-tested and Toni and I make too much money to qualify). And 3), as I say, even with a five-figure hospital stay in there, made out far better last year paying cash for services than I would have buying first-dollar coverage.
So, on balance, are more people being hurt or helped by this law?
Based on past history -- true, no accurate predictor of future performance, but still -- and a good dose of horse sense, I gotta believe that more harm than good is all that can come of Obamacare.
Mark Philip Alger
| Comments (0)
|
...
Wednesday, April 04, 2012
Doncha Just Love It...
WHEN THE ENEMY GIVES YOU tips on how to beat him? I mean... does it insult your intelligence, or merely amuse you when a Democrat opines on what the Republicans should do to win?
Omaba's former watermelon czar*, Vann Jones averred as how it would be a brilliant maneuver for Romney to pick Condi Rice for his Veep.
But, Vann! You don't get it! Condi is a RINO squish. We don't need TWO of them on the ticket!
Or maybe he does know that.
Oh, fersher, Dolly. Remember what I always say about "unintended consequences." They don't happen. All consequences are intended. If they're not, the person eventuating them is incompetent. Same thing with bad tactical advice from the enemy. It's not intended to benefit you; it's item(s) from a wish-list.
(*That's green on the outside, red on the inside, as the global environmentalist wacko movement is the new home for international revolutionary marxism. Nothing to do with fried chicken and collard greens. Why is it your mind always goes there? Nothing to see. Move along.)
Mark Philip Alger
| Comments (0)
|
...
Wednesday, April 04, 2012
They Tell Writers of Fiction...
NOT TO USE THE PASSIVE voice because it's -- well -- passive. Weak. Some critters will even go so far as to tell you you should never use any construction with the verb to be.
As liars go, fictioneers have nothing on politicians.
So, the head of the GSA resigns under an ethical cloud. "Ethics are a big issue for me," she said upon ascending to the office. Now we learn she actually mean she has issues with ethics. "Taxpayer funds were mis-spent," she admits. Not, you will notice, "I mis-spent taxpayer funds."
Mistakes were made. There were ethical lapses. Monies were mal-appropriated.
Please note the lack of an actor in each statement. Who made the mistakes? Whose ethics lapsed? Who mal-appropriated or mis-spent monies? These are questions that need to be asked, and sharply, repeatedly, until satisfactory answers are forthcoming. No. Shift that from passive to active voice. Until the miscreant in question fesses up.
Mark Philip Alger
| Comments (1)
|
...
Wednesday, April 04, 2012
She’s Ba-a-a-a-a-ack...
IF YOU'VE ONLY BEEN reading blogs for a year, you may not be aware of one of the long-time gems of the blogosphere, Darling Rachel Lucas. No, "Darling" isn't part of her name, but it should be. Because she is, of course, you silly person.
Anyway. She's been busy, well -- having a life, I suppose -- and not blogging much for the last ... wow! It's been less than a year? Seems like a century we've been without our Rachel fix. So she's back. Go show her support and encouragement. These things matter.
Mark Philip Alger
| Comments (0)
|
...
...
Monday, April 02, 2012
Big Doin’s...
FOR THE FORSEEABLE FUTURE there will be parallel development going on here and at my new DreamHosted WordPress site. Right now, there isn't anything to see. Generic template, limited content. As time goes on, there will gradually appear the contents of the present Apocrypha site, and then... more. My intent is to accomplish the changeover seamlessly. We shall see.
One thing is pretty much for certain. The heirarchy between this blog and the Apocrypha site will change. I will probably also go back to the model I used when I first started blogging, that of maintaining a site about writing and my writings, and another for bloviating about current events. We'll see how that works out.
As Roo put it, a lot of we'll-seeing, but nothing ever happens. So ... we'll see.
It is possible to register and comment over there, though there won't be much to comment on, and I may purge comments before the "real" site goes live -- depends on how things shake out. One of the issues that has given me pause has been the problem of transferring my Member base from one system to the other. If regulars here wish to help out and register over there, well, it would be appreciated, but I for one will certainly understand if you'd rather not bother.
Sometime in the future, once members HAVE been transferred -- or given the option to migrate on their own -- I will probably shut down new registrations here. But that's a long way off. I'm just getting started. No way of knowing how big this thing is going to get.
Mark Philip Alger
| Comments (0)
|
...
Saturday, March 31, 2012
You’d Think So-Called Educators...
WOULD KNOW THIS ONE. You can add all the feathers you can harvest (please make sure they're not from endangered species). You can stick them on with wax. You can flap until your arms are tired. If the system isn't engineered for flight from the ground up, it'll have all the aerodynamic qualities of a brick.
It's almost as though they'd all been paying attention to irrelevant stuff (such as fallacious theories of pedagogy) and ignored -- you know -- the actual subject matter.
Now, why would you do that?
Mark Philip Alger
| Comments (0)
|
...
Friday, March 30, 2012
It’s About Freakin’ Time...
HEADLINE AT THE HILL.COM reads, GOP Shifts to Offense in Highway Bill Fight.
You know, you could just write, "GOP Shifts to Offense" -- full stop -- and consider that a feelgood news piece. Really doesn't matter what the subject is. Just that the GOP in Congress were to show some spine would be good news.
And then there's this:
If an extension is not passed before Saturday, the government's authority to collect the 18.4 cent-per-gallon gasoline tax would expire.
Which excites two responses. A) "You say that like it's a BAD thing." And 2) "Only 18.4 cents? Damn! We need to work on that!"
Mark Philip Alger
| Comments (3)
|
...
Friday, March 30, 2012
So Monoculture Is...
BY THE ENVIRO-WACKOS a bad thing. And I'm not sayin' they're wrong. Still and all look at Washington, DC. Talk about your company town. Except it's not the workers who owe their souls to the company store, but the customer. How wack is that?
Worse, Baby Doll. We're not the customer; we're the -- as Ross Perot put it -- the owners of the country. And the employees have taken over and maxxed out the credit cards on stuff we don't need, don't want, and surely can't afford. And they're living large on our dime. And when you say they ought to be prosecuted for it, they look at you like you're head's on backwards. As Nancy Pelosi famously said, "Are you serious?"
Serious as a heart attack, honey. Enjoy it while it lasts.
Gabrielle Francesca "Dolly" East
| Comments (0)
|
...
Thursday, March 29, 2012
Sad News...
OUR CURMUDGEON has announced that he will be shutting down Eternity Road as of the first of next month. It's a shame it has to end -- like many, I got a lot of pleasure out of reading there daily. But all good things come to an end, and -- when you think about it, between ER and the Palace of Reason, Fran has had an incredible string of hits. Anybody can get tired and frustrated, wanting to do other things, but feeling burdened by the blog. I completely understand. But I also know we'll miss it, here at BTB, and will keep an eye out for Fran and his alter ego to pop up around the Intertubes and sure to delight. And, as one of the reasons Fran has given for shutting down ER is so he can pay more attention to his fictioneering, here's hoping we'll have occasion down the road to cheer the decision as ultimately a wise one.
All the best in your endeavors, Fran. You'll be in our thoughts always.
Mark Philip Alger
| Comments (1)
|
...
The Cloud Observatory
Wednesday, March 28, 2012
Observation 52 (New Series)...
...
Wednesday, March 28, 2012
Quote of the Day...
You don't have a soul. You are a soul. You have a body.
--C.S. Lewis
Mark Philip Alger
| Comments (2)
|
...
Wednesday, March 28, 2012
Trayvon Martin...
IN ORDER TO PROTEST the apparently killing of a hooded yoot' by a putative vigilante, the New Black Panther Party, et al, propose ... vigiliantism.
And people wonder why the rest of the country -- including a good many black folk of my acquaintance -- view black race hustlers somewhat askance. (Just listen to the tone and the words when the talk turns to the behavior of "Jesse" (no last name -- everybody knows who you mean).)
I mean, it's possible the kid himself was acting in self-defense, although repeated curbings of Zimmerman's skull makes me tend toward skepticism, but we don't know. And leaping into the abyss of conclusions serves no one except those bent on invidious bad faith acts.
And it's a wonder that the black proponents of a lynching aren't having their heads asplode from the dissonance.
::wanders off humming Lady Day's Strange Fruit.::
Meanwhile, in Cincinnati, they had a march Tuesday to support Trayvon Martin, who's been dead and -- one presumes -- buried for a month, now. One hopes Mr. Martin has taken note of it.
And nobody -- in my hearing at least -- has a thought for the unseemliness of that.
Mark Philip Alger
| Comments (0)
|
...
Wednesday, March 28, 2012
Say It Out Loud...
ANYONE WHO RESISTS voter ID laws is bent on electoral mischief and vote fraud. Such resistance must be taken as prima facie evidence of bad faith intent.
The idea that minorities (read: blacks) somehow cannot get a photo ID solely on account of their being minorities is demeaning and racist.
Mark Philip Alger
| Comments (0)
|
...
...
The Cloud Observatory
Tuesday, March 27, 2012
Observation 51 (New Series)...
...
Tuesday, March 27, 2012
Man, It Makes Me So Mad...
MAKES ME SO ANGRY when I hear people arguing about the so-called Affordable Care Act. (In an aside, have you ever known any name any legislature has given to any bill to accurately reflect either the intent or the actual effect of the law that eventuated?) Everybody seems to miss the point. It's not whether the fine is a tax or a fine. It's not whether the individual mandate is constitutional or not (though, still, it's not). It's that Congress does not now nor has it ever had the lawful authority to legislate in the matter at all. That it has nevertheless done so in the past is no good reason to allow this outrage to stand. That's not prudence or modesty, it's dumb obstinance in error. Pure fallacy. The solution is not to add insult to injury, but rather to pull Congress back out of the realm where it has no brief to go. No legislation in the matter of private arrangments between citizens -- in any matter.
Good luck with that.
So... what? You just throw your hands up and surrender? Well, I don't accept that, Dolly. You don't get to waive my rights. It doesn't work that way.
Actually, I think it does. At least, that's the way it looks from here.
You're not helping.
Mark Philip Alger
| Comments (0)
|
...
Tuesday, March 27, 2012
Is Property a Civil Right...
SURE SEEMS LIKE IT ought to be, which -- I guess -- in this day and age means the government will tell you it's not, it's a privilege granted or witheld at the whim of the Federal bureaucracy. But at one time, the Founders thought it ought to be. In fact, the famous phrase, "Life, Liberty, and the Pursuit of Happiness" originally read, "Life, Liberty, and Property." Not that you have the right to have property given to you, or to a specific piece of property, but that the right to own property is a fundamental condition of a free state.
Glenn Beck, on radio last Thursday in the 10:00 hour, was retailing the horror story of a property owner denied free exercise of proeprty rights by the EPA. The story popped up elsewhere in the news and on the Web during the day.
In my opinion, the immediate individual officer(s) of the EPA are liable for civil rights violation, of a right to and in private property, protected by the Ninth Amendment and by the absolute absence of any enabling clause in Article One. Further, the latter condition affirmatively prohibits Congress from legislating in the matter.
And, yes, a finding for a plaintiff in such a case would necessarily define the EPA as an unconsitutional agency. That is a feature, not a bug.
Mark Philip Alger
| Comments (0)
|
...
Tuesday, March 27, 2012
Obama Makes a Trenchant...
OBSERVATION ABOUT Stalinist North Korea, but fails to apprehend that, staring through binoculars across the DMZ, he's looking into his own future.
Mark Philip Alger
| Comments (0)
|
...
Tuesday, March 27, 2012
People Talk About Institutions...
OF HIGHER LEARNING owing their graduates rebates, if not full refunds, for misrepresentation of the value of a sheepskin, let alone the merchantability of their education itself. And they're not wrong.
But me, being all contrapuntal and stuff, I wonder how long it's going to take Harvard (and Columbia) to demand the President stop representing himself as a graduate -- that he's devaluing their brands, as it were. I mean, what smartest person in the room would pull some of the boners he has?
Examples? You want examples? Have you not been paying attention for the last three years?
Mark Philip Alger
| Comments (0)
|
...
...
Monday, March 26, 2012
So the Human Wave...
MY... I GUESS YOU COULD CALL IT my political awakening came at just-barely-ten, in the summer of 1964. Prior to that time, I knew that my mom preferred Nixon to Kennedy -- claimed special knowledge of the sins of the Kennedies due to having lived in Boston at the time of JFK's first run for national office and seen firsthand the hamfisted tactics of the Democrat machine -- and that Barry Goldwater was somehow special because his name could be rendered AUH20. After that, I had a label for myself and the beginnings of an understanding of the nature and desiderata of human interactions.
My at-the-time best (well, only) friend, (Hey, Aroother, wherever you are), in the middle of one of those perfect Tom Sawyer days, taken at his grandparents' farm, asked me what political strip I considered myself. Now, given that our parents were cut of the same conservative cloth and saw it meet for us to associate, it was a pretty good bet we weren't that far apart. But Art was a precocious kid. Then between fourth and fifth grades, he was already an accomplished radio amateur, and in a year, he'd skip six grade and go straight into Walnut Hills High School, Cincinnati's high-ranking yuppie brat academy. (Full disclosure: I went there, too, only a year later, so, being an insider, I get to snark about it.) I tell you that to tell you this: he was politically advanced on me. But his question, as perspicacious as it was, nailed the point in one.
"Do you," he asked when I admitted to my essential cluelessness on the subject, "Believe in Live and Let Live?"
It was a phrase I'd heard before. Not given it much thought, but it did resonate with me as being "right." As in correct. I had no notion then of Left and Right in the political sense. So I answered, "Yes." And, in that moment, it became truth. I really did believe in Live and Let Live. It seemed to me an excellent guiding principle to live by, and I have tried to ever since.
"You," he informed me as only a precocious ten-year-old can do, "Are a libertarian."
First I'd heard of it. But I immediately grokked the term, though I didn't hear the word "grok" for awhile, yet.
So, imagine the 'splosion inside my little skull-full-of-mush when, two years later, here came Robert Heinlein -- already my favorite science fiction author -- with The Moon is a Harsh Mistress. Which showed an entire generation -- if they would appropriate the lesson -- the full implications of living by that simple phrase and touchstone -- Live and Let Live.
And that, sometimes, you have to fight for it.
It may have been that Heinlein's writing resonated so loudly with my parents that his books were ubiquitous in our house. It may have been that his entire oeuvre-to-date was in print throughout my childhood, adolescence, and young adulthood -- while so few others' were. It may have just been that he was the most popular single science fiction author of the 20th Century and everybody read him. Whatever it was, I read his entire works as were in print -- many of them as they first appeared in public. (Yes, that is intended to make you young whippersnappers envious.)
And, it may have been that ubiquity and completeness, or it may have been that Heinlein was so very good at heinleining -- and not just engineering and futuristic concepts, but also political and moral ones as well -- but I absorbed a great deal of my world view from him, by osmosis, and largely unawares -- in the manner of a fish absorbing oxygen from the water passing over its gills.
At about the same time, enrolled at Walnut Hills, which -- for your reference -- proudly counts among its alumni both Jerry Rubin and Elisabeth Bumiller, I encountered any number of liberals, socialists, and red diaper babies. I hung out with members of the Unitarian Church's Liberal Religious Youth organization. Some of my best friends were yippies, communists, members of SDS -- and later, I'm sure -- the Weather Underground. The school hosted sit-ins almost before the wider community had ever heard of them. Students participated in left wing agitprop and demonstrations. One of the biggest I recall was for the first Earth Day in 1970.
My senior year I had a course called Socio-Economics. At the time, I thought it was similar to social studies, which was purported to be a mashup of history and geography. These days, it should be very easy to spot the rat in the trashheap there. My Sosh-Ec teacher refused to allow me to read Heinlein's Channel Markers (from Analog) to the class. (That was 1972, which was why I thought for sure the thing had to have appeared the latest in 1971, not '74, like everybody says.) He said it was a fascist tract. I guess that was when the mask began to slip.
All during my six years at Walnut, various folks of liberal stripes tried to persuade me that, as a libertarian, I really belonged in their camp. And they sold it so prettily, too. My Ancient and Medieval History teacher said more than once that, in that day and age, a true conservative had to be a liberal. He may have been right: someone wishing to conserve the values of the American founding should consider himself to be a classica liberal. But, of course, that's not what my teacher meant. My LRY friends called me a fellow traveler, said they wanted the same things -- self-determination, respect for individuals.
Only the communists were really honest. "Come the revolution..." they said, and they didn't sugar-coat it.
But, even then, for those with the eyes to see, the American Left was already in the thrall of international revolutionary Marxism. And they were following the Gramscian prescription of the long march through the institutions. There was an "of course" about all of the cultural marxism -- television, radio, music, the movies... and, of course, literature. Back then, reading Atlas Shrugged was a pretty bold move. Reading it in public was practically looking for a fight. Starship Troopers was another. Funnily enough, though, an alum who'd been to Israel, worked on a kibbutz, and joined the IDF for the '67 war wasn't so adamant about it. He'd seen the elephant. He knew what Heinlein was talking about.
And, pondering the issue now, the Left's almost knee-jerk reaction to Starship Troopers was an early case (for my generation at least) of a derangement syndrome that also had leftists reacting to any strong figure from the Right like vampires to garlic. One thing that threw some of us off was Nixon. Nixon really was a bad guy, or so it seemed. G. Gordon Liddy in the '90s made a strong case that the real bad guy in Watergate was the odidous John Dean, and that the crime was committed for rather tawdry reasons. But we didn't know any of that at the time. And Nixon resigned in disgrace. So, when the Left started frothing at the mouth and doing their very best St. Vitus' Dance at the mere mention of Nixon's name, it was to some extent understandable.
But Robert Heinlein? Did they know he'd supported communists in the '30s? (But then, everybody did.) The cognitive dissonance of calling the author of Stranger in a Strange Land a fascist just didn't register with anyone. They were simply deranged on the subject. Some of them still are.
Long about the same time as Art and I had our proto-political discussion, a "movement" in science fiction that had its roots, according to some, in the same period that gave us Heinlein (and Asimov and myriad others) -- the New Wave. Whether it was Merrill or Moorcock or Harlan Ellison that gave us the term, there were many authors who gave us the fiction. In a sort of a manifesto at the time, (1962), J.G. Ballard (who has many other sins to answer for as well) was read to utter:
… I think science fiction should turn its back on space, on interstellar travel, extra-terrestrial life forms, galactic wars and the overlap of these ideas that spreads across the margins of nine-tenths of magazine s-f. Great writer though he was, I'm convinced H. G. Wells has had a disastrous influence on the subsequent course of science fiction … similarly, I think, science fiction must jettison its present narrative forms and plots.
I read this then -- and read it now -- as saying that mankind should turn its back on the possibility of space exploration and the rest, as well as an optimistic view of "the" future -- of any possible future -- in favor of Ballard's preferences.
Quelle reactionary. Quelle dirigisme.
And, yes, I enjoyed Moorcock's Corum stories and Elric of Melnibone [sic], and Harlan Ellison's lyrical way with titles, if nothing else, and Samuel Delaney's -- well, everything except Dahlgren -- and Dangerous Visions and Again, Dangerous Visions and Dangerous Visions 3D (I keed, I keed).
But the relentless pessimism was a drag. I was so glad that, when the Campbell awards were initiated, the first few winners had a generally affirmational view of humanity and the future. It seemed a counter to the otherwise omnipresent negativity of the field in the late '60s and '70s. It seemed to presage a positive direction for the field.
In the years between school and the beginning of my present career, I took a stab at writing for realsies. I'd done the usual pastiches and cris de coeur poetry in high school and gone nowhere with it. By my mid-20s, I had a small trunk of juevnalia I kept hauling around and polishing. Polishing a turd, as somebody said. I had a brief correspondence with Ben Bova when he was editor at Analog after John Campbell died. He's a Facebook friend now, but I doubt he remembers one particular starry-eyed kid who could never get the science right from the '70s. Then I had to earn a living and the writing got stuffed in a file drawer and forgotten for twenty years.
I kept reading speculative fiction. But none of it had the same impact on me that the Tarzan books I'd red in a hot attic from the original pulp editions with the WWI notices about saving paper for the war effort. Or the Barsoom books, or Have Spacesuit Will Travel or Podkayne. None of it made me tear up like: Oh, Bog. Is a computer one of your creatures?
Oh, sure, there were good books in there -- gold among the dross. I still buy every book that C.J. Cherryh puts out. Emma Bull, Spider Robinson, Orson Scott Card... But there were so many -- too damned many -- who got one book published, then disappeared. For the longest time, I thought it was me. I've always been short of pocket money. There have been long stretches when I didn't have money to buy new books. I figured those works came out and went out of print in those intervals. And, shamefully, I never missed a lot of them.
Little did I know political correctness had taken hold and clung for dear life around the throat of FSF. The muscular, no fear, open-eyed literature of ideas I had so loved in my youth had turned into yet another fever swamp of the Left. Editors and publishers, post modern lit crit majors burrowed into the publishing houses and hollowed them out. And the new conglomerates who bought up the old houses didn't care so long as the bottom line was in black.
Still and all, there remained an optimistic core. Or cadre, if you will.
Yeah, there were the technocrats who couldn't comprehend the flaw of their premise that, if we could only elect the right smart people, all our problems would be solved, or if the smartest people could somehow become benevolent dictators -- and you know they'd be benevolent -- or if the right race of space aliens could come and save us from all the myriad sins of humanity. And they seemed to occupy ever more of the nice neighborhoods in utopian cities. And their aliens never came and asked, "Why didn't you kill all the tyrants?" "When will you people learn not to trust those who seek power?" "What happened to all your individuals?"
But in the ghettos of those utopias, subsisting on the leavings of those arrogant enough to think themselves our betters, we lovers of liberty and the essential promise of Man lurked and plotted. And our core belief was that we wanted to take power to abdicate it. We wanted to get the reins of government to leave the people alone, to force the government to leave US alone. To force the establishment to get out of the way of the only true human progress -- that of the individual.
It started in radio, with the ending of the Fairness Doctrine. It has flowed through the culture, at about twice the pace as the leftists marched, and now it threatens the Left's hegemony, and they're starting to panic. They believe the old wheeze about the pendulum of politics and its supposed swing from left to right and back again. But it's much, much worse. Because we in the Right -- and in the Human Wave (to the extent the two are not entirely congruent) -- know this about human progress.
True human progress trends toward the maximization of the ability of the individual human being to realize his full potential. Anything which contributes to that is good, anything that detracts from that is evil. And collectivism -- of any stripe -- does not enhance the freedom of the individual to be his best. And more and more human individuals are coming to realize this.
And, folks, mark my words: there's no pendulum swing on that. There's only one way to go: the more people realize the benefits of freedom, the more will want it. And the only reason to even slow that progress is with lies. Lies that are far too easy to expose.
In the last decade or so, I have taken the pen back up to write again. I have a pocketful of stories to tell, and the time and energy to tell them. And, though I don't intend to suffuse them with the scandals of the day, there are eternal verities, such as that basic truth about individuals, that are unavoidable. You will come to know my characters as individuals, each and every one of them struggling in his or her own way to be free.
And that, my friends, is why I am a Human Waver. I believe in progress -- true progress. I write to expose the lies.
There are other reasons to be a Waver, of course, but those are mine. The Other Side will fight us tooth and nail. Doesn't matter. We're right. We're in the majority. We will win. As Chip Delaney put it in Babel 17, This war will be over in six weeks. Well, maybe a touch longer, but the outcome is not really in doubt.
Mark Philip Alger
| Comments (1)
|
...
Thursday, March 22, 2012
Bush v. Gore Did Not...
-- SCORN QUOTES -- "change history", but not for the reasons Althouse adduces. (Although she's not wrong in her own context.) Folks, this has broader implications than con-law inside baseball. And remember this when you're calibrating your BS meter. Very rarely does it take inside knowledge to throw the bright yellow bollocks flag. Most of the time, all you need is basic understanding of how the world works.
Take this case, frex. Nothing that happened in the past -- no matter how epochal its effects -- can properly be said to have "changed history." And all you need to know to realize that is the definition of history. History is a recording of past events. By definition you cannot change that. Oh, you can learn new facts and change the recording, but that's not the usage here. The usage is claiming that past events changed past events.
Just sitting here watching your head wobbita, boss.
Certain epochal events could be said to have made history, but just saying that should let you realize how silly the contention is. Historical events made history. Well... DUH.
...
Oh, and...
On Gore v Bush
It was my opinion at the time and remains so today that the contretemps in Florida during the 2000 Presidential election was the tip of the iceberg of the Democrat party trying to steal an election. And, if you remember the recordings of the preppy Republican mob calling for an honest count in Dade County, I was not alone in that assumption. I seem to recall that one left-leaning friend of mine agreed as well. Gore got caught and had to defend the indefensible. And, yes, it may very well have unhinged him, but he was on the CAGW hobbyhorse long before that (read: Earth in the Lurch (1992)).
(H/T: Insty.)
Mark Philip Alger
| Comments (0)
|
...
Thursday, March 22, 2012
You Mean You Can...
CALL YOURSELF A COMEDIAN without a government-issued license? Doesn't truth in advertising hold sway here? How can Bill Maher call himself a comedian when he isn't funny? Shouldn't the FTC investigate?
</snarcasm>
Pity you have to label it.
Yeah, well. Back in the '60s, I was amazed that somebody could sue a property owner for an injury sustained while trespassing -- and not be thrown out of court on his ear. So you can tell I come by my neanderthalitanism honestly.
Mark Philip Alger
| Comments (0)
|
...
Wednesday, March 21, 2012
Is Survival Ethical...
IN A SPEECH BEFORE THE graduating class of midshipmen at Anapolis (which I could swear was printed in Analog in 1971, but everybody says it was 1974), later given the title "Channel Markers," (and then was printed in Expanded Universe as The Pragmatics of Patriotism in 1980-ish), Robert Heinlein exposited his thesis that patriotism is the highest ethical behavior possible for a human being -- ethical being defined as that behavior which tends to promote the survival of the species. And he took a troop of baboons as his -- so to speak -- text, pointing out the facets of their division of labor in aid of the security of the troop in illustration.
The New York Times wants you to defend the eating of meat as ethical.
Well, Dolly, if it were me, I'd accept their premise -- that it's not -- and the consequence -- starvation -- and tell them "You first." But that's just me.
Yes. It is, innit? And this is moi: they obviously have mistaken me for someone who actually believes there is no such thing as a stupid question. I also wonder what they think of Heinlein's thesis.
And, by the way, I did not know that totse (Temple of the Screaming Electron) was still online. I would have thought the site would fall victim to PATRIOT act suppression of "dangerous" knowledge. Apropos of almost nothing at all.
Gabrielle Francesca "Dolly" East
| Comments (0)
|
...
Wednesday, March 21, 2012
Being an Autodidact...
I'VE HAD CONSIDERABLE opportunity to observe myself learning things. Though I know better than to generalize from my singular experience, I can't help wondering how universal it might be nonetheless.
For example, I say often that I learn best and fastest by breaking something and then fixing it. The urgency of needing to get a system or object back into working order has some bearing on this, I'm sure, as does the "muscle memory" of having done something -- even only once -- as opposed to merely reading about it. And then I read how many really smart and inventive people got their start exploring the universe by taking things apart as a kid. My mental metaphor is that of an alarm clock: fairly large-scale, relatively simple, albeit incredibly sophisticated, and filled with lessons on mechanics, materials, and the rest. And filled with myriad tiny parts which, when spread out across a working surface (and thus subject to loss and disturbance of ad hoc order), can provide a motivating spur similar to having a long suffering mother waiting for you to put her oven back together so she can fix dinner.
Which all makes this quite interesting. I've always had more trouble learning from online texts than from printed ones, although I've put it down to the scattered, unfocused, and nonlinear aspects of hypertext more than anything. Maybe there's another cause -- a difference in comprehension.
Hmm. Have to watch that and see where it leads.
Mark Philip Alger
| Comments (0)
|
...
Wednesday, March 21, 2012
Wait Just a Minute...
IF JP MORGAN CHASE can freeze the Vatican's bank accounts on suspicion of money laundering -- presumably at the behest of the United States government --
Since the Vatican is a sovereign state...
Is that not an act of war? Unalloyed aggression by one state against another?
Mark Philip Alger
| Comments (0)
|
...
Previously on BabyTrollBlog...
