Clear and Succinct

STATEMENTS are of value in debate, such as this one, found at Junk Science.

Bizarrely, NASA’s GISS does not use satellite data to guesstimate global temperature but prefers to perform voodoo incantations over appallingly corrupt near-surface amalgams.

One should wonder why a space agency declines to use data sourced at least partly from its own satellites, data virtually free of urban heat island contamination and with the greatest and most uniform global coverage by far, while promoting its space-borne observation platforms as a solution to a problem like enhanced greenhouse when its space-borne platforms demonstrate observed atmospheric trends can not possibly be due to enhanced greenhouse in the first place.

“Appallingly corrupt” — I like that. The turn of phrase, that is, not the condition.

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *